Comments on: IntelliScreen 1.04

By: emanuel

emanuel — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:44:59 +0000

man, it was not accepted beacuse the apps can only be in their own folder and dont interfer with other apps folders and main system!

By: Rp4k

Rp4k — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:14:31 +0000

if your correct then there would be no reason why appstore wouldn’t allow this app.. they said it does use more battery when the phone is in its sleep mode because of it continually checking for updates. its not rubbish , just install it and use it for like 4 months and watch and see what will happen to your phone. i have been a developer for iphone since version 1.0.2 of iphone so i do know what im talking about since i have seen all the ups and down. and even read bigboss’s review he agrees with me on what and how this will damage your phone over a long period of time. but if you don’t want to believe me then keep using it and i hope your phone doesn’t over heat

By: me

me — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:09:17 +0000

IntelliScreen does not use more battery power then other Applications. Specifically, it has been designed to be very conservative with CPU usage. However, if you add 50 News Feeds refreshing every 15 minutes, of course your battery will drain more quickly. Also, if you set alerts to every 2 minutes, and don’t acknowledge the alert for hours, your battery will drain much quicker during the course of a day. Our recommendation is to refresh feeds every 6 hours, and not to set alerts less then 5 minutes apart unless required and you will be able to acknowledge the alert quickly.

By: me

me — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:06:01 +0000

please don’t talk rubbish.. I don’t believe you..

By: rp4k

rp4k — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:46:04 +0000

listen I didnt say “battery cycle” i said battery LIFE (over the entire battery life cycle) plus if you want to spend the money nobody is stopping you. but just use some logic if apple didnt approve this app because of how much of a battery drain and the fact that its on the lock screen then maybe the developer should have made this app intergrated into the springboard. use at your own risk as everyone says

By: d

Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:21:47 +0000

And why its every body has something negative to say now is not free?

By: d

Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:19:25 +0000

Battery cycle? makes no sense. Your using your battery all the time on your iphone? Make a valid point

By: rp4k

rp4k — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:36:25 +0000

yes we have lots of proof its all in IRC core.osx86.hu join room #iPhone and talk to me or bigboss or any developer plus apples reason why they won’t have any apps on home screen is because of what it does to the battery lifecycle . plus apps are not supposed to run in the background especially when the phone is in sleep. if u still dont believe me use the app for like 3 months and watch your battery charge voltage change threw hw info app

By: Scott

Scott — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:13:27 +0000

Do you have any proof or benchmarks on this? You’ve posted this several times about this app on different sites, with no backup at all…

By: rp4k

rp4k — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:33:51 +0000

it damages the batterys life cycle that is why appstore won’t have this app. this app is garbage. yes works great but screws up the phone overall